Quality of life rapidly improves with budesonide therapy for active Crohn's disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our aims were to assess the impact on healthrelated quality of life (HRQOL) of a controlled ileal release (CIR) formulation of budesonide in active Crohn's disease (CD) and further define the role of HRQOL, using the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ), in assessing outcome in CD. A randomized trial was conducted in 258 patients with active ileal or ileocecal CD. Budesonide CIR 1.5 mg, 4.5 mg, 7.5 mg, or placebo was given b.i.d. for 8 weeks. IBDQ score changes were compared among groups. Correlations for IBDQ and Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) scores were calculated. Mean IBDQ scores improved significantly over placebo by 2 weeks in budesonide 15 mg (155 ± 38; p = 0.006) and 9 mg groups (157 ± 33; p = 0.0002). Bowel, systemic, social, and emotional subscores were also significantly better (p < 0.002) at 2 and 8 weeks in the 9 mg group. Improved HRQOL scores correlated well with decreased CDAI (−0.8 < r < −0.4). Average per item change in IBDQ at remission was 1.17 to 1.48. Prior surgery (p < 0.005) or current smoker (p < 0.05) status predicted poorer initial HRQOL but not response. Budesonide CIR 9 or 15 mg/day rapidly and significantly improved HRQOL in active CD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".