MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072696277 · doi:10.1180/minmag.2009.073.5.847

Cámaraite, Ba<sub>3</sub>NaTi<sub>4</sub>(Fe<sup>2+</sup>,Mn)<sub>8</sub>(Si<sub>2</sub>O<sub>7</sub>)<sub>4</sub>O<sub>4</sub>(OH,F)<sub>7</sub>. I. A new Ti-silicate mineral from the Verkhnee Espe Deposit, Akjailyautas Mountains, Kazakhstan

2009· article· en· W2072696277 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMineralogical Magazine · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlatyCrystallographyPleochroismMohs scale of mineral hardnessTriclinic crystal systemChemistryUltraviolet lightMaterials scienceMineralogyCrystal structure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Cámaraite, ideally Ba 3 NaTi 4 (Fe 2+ ,Mn) 8 (Si 2 O 7 ) 4 O 4 (OH,F) 7 , is a new mineral from the Verkhnee Espe deposit, Akjailyautas Mountains, Kazakhstan. It occurs as intergrowths with bafertisite and jinshajiangite in separate platy crystals up to 8 mm × 15 mm × 2 mm in size, or as star-shaped aggregates of crystals with different orientations. Individual crystals are orange-red to brownish-red, and are platy on {001}. Cámaraite is translucent and has a pale-yellow streak, a vitreous lustre, and does not fluoresce under cathode or ultraviolet light. Cleavage is {001} perfect, no parting was observed, and Mohs hardness is &lt;5; the mineral is brittle. The calculated density is 4.018 g cm -3 . In transmitted light, camaraite is strongly pleochroic, X = light brown, Y = reddish-brown, Z = yellow- brown, with Z &lt; X &lt; Y. Cámaraite is biaxial +ve and 2V meas . = 93(1)°. All refractive indices are greater than 1.80. Cámaraite is triclinic, space group C , a = 10.678(4) Å, b = 13.744(8) Å, c = 21.40(2) Å, α = 99.28(8)°, β = 92.38(5)°, γ = 90.00(6)°, V = 3096(3) Å 3 , Z = 4, a:b:c = 0.7761:1:1.5565. The seven strongest lines in the X-ray powder-diffraction pattern are as follows: [ d (Å), ( I ), ( hkl )]: 2.63, (100), (401); 2.79, (90), ( 3, 41, 2 6, 225); 1.721, (70), ( 11, 49, 0 2); 3.39, (50), (2 4, 223); 3.18, (50), ( 5, 24); 2.101, (50), ( 2, 40); 1.578, (50), ( 1, 2, 6 1, 40). Chemical analysis by electron microprobe gave: Nb 2 O 5 1.57, SiO 2 25.25, TiO 2 15.69, ZrO 2 0.33, Al 2 O 3 0.13, Fe 2 O 3 2.77, FeO 16.54, MnO 9.46, ZnO 0.12, MgO 0.21, CaO 0.56, BaO 21.11, Na 2 O 1.41, K 2 O 0.84, H 2 O 1.84, F 3.11, less O:F 1.31, total 99.63 wt.%, where the valence state of Fe was determined by Mössbauer spectroscopy [Fe 3+ /(Fe 2+ + Fe 3+ ) = 0.13(8)] and the H 2 O content was derived by crystal-structure determination. The resulting empirical formula on the basis of 39 anions is Ca 0.05 ) Σ7.78 Si 7.97 O 35.89 H 3.88 F 3.11 . Cámaraite is a Group-II TS-block mineral in the structure hierarchy of Sokolova (2006). The mineral is named camaraite after Fernando Cámaraite (born 1967) of Melilla, Spain, in recognition of his contribution to the fields of mineralogy and crystallography. The new mineral and mineral name have been approved by the Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification, International Mineralogical Association (IMA 2009-11).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0110.009
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.005
Bibliometrics0.0030.008
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0090.005
Research integrity0.0060.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it