Retained presumed intraocular cotton fiber after cataract operation: Long-term follow-up with in vivo confocal microscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes in eyes with retained presumed intraocular cotton fibers after cataract surgery. SETTING: Hong Kong Eye Hospital, Hong Kong, The People's Republic of China. METHODS: A retrospective review of 19 eyes with retained presumed intraocular cotton fibers after cataract surgery was performed. Outcome measures were fiber-related complications. In vivo confocal microscopy was performed in eyes with entrapped cotton fibers at the wound site. RESULTS: The duration of retained presumed cotton fibers ranged from 5 to 110 months (mean 42.3 months). No complications were noted in any of these eyes, including endophthalmitis, persistent uveitis, or corneal endothelial cell loss. In vivo confocal microscopy in eyes with entrapped fibers at the wound site showed normal corneal endothelium morphology with no keratocyte activation or inflammatory response. CONCLUSIONS: Retained presumed fibers after cataract operations are more common than anticipated. In contrast to other organic foreign bodies, these retained fibers appear to be well tolerated. Conservative treatment can be adopted for these fibers as these pose minimal toxicity to the eye.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".