Investigation of Combined Neutron Scattering and Neutron Radiography Techniques for Measurement of Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neutron radiography has the ability to differentiate between a gas and liquid in two phase flow due both to the density difference and the affinity of Hydrogen to scatter the neutrons. The neutron radiography technique has the additional benefit of visualizing through metal walls due to the low probability of neutron interactions with most metals which has resulted in significant studies using neutron radiography for the measurement of two-phase flow. The studies have shown that both real-time and high-speed imaging of two-phase flow is possible for the measurement of void distribution in air-water, steam-water, and gas-liquid metal flow. However, since neutron radiography is a planar method, full three dimensional capability of two-phase flow has not yet been demonstrated. The purpose of this work is to investigate if neutron scattering could provide additional information to supplement the information obtained in real-time neutron radiography. Experiments are performed with a real-time neutron radiography system which provides the two-dimensional information. A turntable is used to evaluate the 3D structure of a non-moving two-phase system to identify the three dimensional structure. Additional thermal neutron detectors are placed at the periphery of the neutron beam to detect the scattered neutrons. The detector response as a function of the location of a gas-liquid interface rotated through the third dimension can be obtained. The neutron radiography technique was able to resolve the interface. The location of the interface could be observed to move as the object was rotated in the beam yet the location of the interface along the neutron beam axis could not be determined by radiography alone as expected. The neutron scattering technique did provide additional information in the third dimension and thus it was possible by using both techniques to locate the gas-liquid interface.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".