Genetic linkage map of <i><scp>L</scp>olium multiflorum</i> Lam. constructed from a BC<sub>1</sub> population derived from an interspecific hybridization, <i><scp>L</scp>. multiflorum</i> × <i><scp>Lolium</scp> temulentum</i> L. × <i><scp>L</scp>. temulentum</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers and conserved‐intron scanning primer (CISP) markers developed from cereal expressed sequence tag sequences were successfully used to construct a linkage map for Lolium multiflorum Lam. using a L. multiflorum × Lolium temulentum L. × L. temulentum BC1 population consisting of 88 individuals. The genetic linkage map included 108 SSR and 84 CISP markers that covered 488.8 centimorgan (cM) in seven linkage groups, ranging in length from 42.2 to 98.9 cM. The average density of markers was 2.5 cM. Syntenic relationships between Lolium and rice (Oryza sativa L.) based on the positions of the CISP markers largely agree with the previously reported relationships. The map constructed in the present study will be useful in developing a denser linkage map as well as for analysis of quantitative trait loci for important agronomic traits in Lolium species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".