MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Human Experience with Canal Plugging

2001· review· en· W2072759690 on OpenAlexaff
Sumit Agrawal, Lorne S. Parnes

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2001
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicVestibular and auditory disorders
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canal occlusion/plugging is a very effective technique with a low risk to hearing. The series of posterior semicircular canal occlusions described in this review now becomes the largest in the literature to date. It continues to support this procedure as the treatment of choice for intractable benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV). All 44 operated ears were relieved of BPPV, with one patient having an atypical late recurrence. Of the 40 ears with normal preoperative hearing, one had a delayed (3-month) sudden and permanent profound loss, while one other had a mild (20 dB) loss. Six patients had protracted courses of imbalance and motion sensitivity. Canal plugging has led to several new and innovative developments including the partial labyrinthectomy for difficult-to-access skull base lesions and superior semicircular canal plugging for dehiscence. These new procedures and their development are reviewed in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.245
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations98
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the New York Academy of SciencesSame topicVestibular and auditory disordersFrench-language works237,207