MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072775569 · doi:10.1117/12.809880

Three-dimensional localization of discrete fluorescent inclusions from multiple tomographic projections in the time-domain

2009· article· en· W2072775569 on OpenAlexaff
Julien Pichette, Éric Lapointe, Yves Bérubé-Lauzière

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Optical Sensing Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluorescenceOpticsPhotonPhoton countingPhysicsWavefrontDetectorTime domainAbsorption (acoustics)ScatteringMaterials scienceComputer scienceComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We introduce a novel approach for localizing a plurality of discrete fluorescent inclusions embedded in a thick scattering medium using time-domain (TD) experimental data. It relies on numerical constant fraction discrimination (NCFD), a signal processing technique for extracting in a stable manner the arrival time of early photons emitted by one or many fluorescent inclusions from measured photons time of flight (TOF) distributions. Our experimental set-up allows multi-view TD data acquisition from multiple tomographic projections over 360 degrees without contact with the medium. Fluorescence time point-spread functions (FTPSFs) are acquired all around the medium with ultra-fast time-correlated single photon counting (TCSPC) after short pulse laser excitation. From these FTPSFs, the early photons arrival time (EPAT) of a fluorescent wavefront at a detector position is extracted with our NCFD technique. The key to our localization algorithm is to combine EPATs from several detection positions and projections to form 3D surfaces. The digital analysis of the concavities of the surfaces allows to find the 3D positions of an a priori unknown number of fluorescent inclusions located in the medium. Indocyanine green (ICG; absorption peak = 780nm, emission peak = 830nm) is used for the inclusions. Various experiments were conducted, and we show localization results on experimental data for up to 5 discrete inclusions distributed at arbitrary positions in the medium. We expect to extend our method to continuous distributions of fluorescence (rather than discrete inclusions) in a near future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.495
Threshold uncertainty score0.705

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicAdvanced Optical Sensing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207