MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072807593 · doi:10.1080/03949370.2014.915430

Implications of female body-size variation for the reproductive ecology of an anuran amphibian

2014· article· en· W2072807593 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueEthology Ecology & Evolution · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmphibian and Reptile Biology
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyFecundityAvian clutch sizeEcologyAssortative matingPopulationAbundance (ecology)MatingPopulation sizeEnergeticsZoologyReproductionDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractAnimal body size has profound ecological and evolutionary implications for lifespan, access to resources and reproduction. Body size, though, is phenotypically plastic and may be strongly correlated with both fecundity and mate choice. Therefore, temporal variation in body size within populations may correspondingly alter a population's reproductive ecology over time and, if not taken into account, bias our perception of it. Male Fowler's Toads (Anaxyrus fowleri) at Long Point, Ontario, have previously been shown to vary in average body size by as much as 18% over a period of 23 years. Here I demonstrate that the females also fluctuate in body size in correlation with their abundance and in synchrony with the males. Clutch size, which averaged 4443 eggs per clutch among 34 females, varied with individual female body size irrespective of temporal variation in average body size or abundance. Body size measurements of females and males in 75 mating pairs over 24 years were, overall, significantly correlated. However, when year-to-year variations in mean body size were accounted for statistically, this apparent evidence of size-assortative mating was negated. These results indicate that abundance, body size and fecundity likely are interrelated aspects of population regulation and that many purported observations of size-assortative mating in animals may need to be re-evaluated.Key Words: long-term studymate choicesexual selectionbody sizefecundityabundance ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSLong Point Provincial Park, the Long Point Bird Observatory, Ed Dirse, the Canadian Wildlife Service and legions of students provided invaluable assistance in the field. Permission to study toads at Long Point was granted by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario Parks, and the Canadian Wildlife Service of Environment Canada. Age determinations were provided by Jessica Middleton. This research was supported by funding from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada, the World Wildlife Fund Canada Endangered Species Recovery Fund, and the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Species at Risk Recovery Fund for Ontario.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.178
Threshold uncertainty score0.580

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it