MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072859658 · doi:10.5539/mer.v1n1p2

Petroleum Reservoir Engineering by Non-linear Singular Integral Equations

2011· article· en· W2072859658 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
E. G. Ladopoulos

Bibliographic record

VenueMechanical Engineering Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPorous mediumIntegral equationOil wellSingular integralPetroleum engineeringPorosityHelmholtz free energyPetroleumHelmholtz equationPetroleum reservoirPartial differential equationWell test (oil and gas)MathematicsMathematical analysisGeologyApplied mathematicsGeotechnical engineeringPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For the determination of the properties of several reservoir materials, when oil reserves are moving through porous media, a new mathematical approach is proposed. Such problem is very much important for petroleum reservoir engineering. Thus, the above mentioned problem is reduced to the solution of a non-linear singular integral equation, which is numerically evaluated by using the Singular Integral Operators Method (S.I.O.M.). Beyond the above, several properties are analyzed and investigated for the porous medium equation, defined as a Helmholtz differential equation. Finally, an application is given for a well testing to be checked when an heterogeneous oil reservoir is moving in a porous medium. Hence, by using the S.I.O.M., then the pressure response from the well test conducted in the above heterogeneous oil reservoir, is numerically calculated and investigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMechanical Engineering ResearchSame topicAdvanced Mathematical Modeling in EngineeringFrench-language works237,207