Light-dependent predation by the invertebrate planktivore Bythotrephes longimanus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We evaluated predation by the invasive invertebrate planktivore Bythotrephes longimanus on a Lake Michigan prey assemblage as a function of light intensity. Daphnia mendotae was the only prey type significantly reduced and light intensity strongly affected this reduction. Specifically, Bythotrephes consumption of D. mendotae was not detected under low light intensity (<1 µmol·m–2·s–1) but increased with greater light intensity and leveled off under high light intensity (>100 µmol·m–2·s–1) at which point Bythotrephes ingestion rate was 2.3 Daphnia per hour. These results indicate that Bythotrephes predation is more sensitive to light than previously thought, a discrepancy that can be explained after considering the ability of D. mendotae to detect Bythotrephes’ hydromechanic disturbance. The observed effect of light intensity on Bythotrephes predation is more like that of planktivorous fish than that of other previously studied invertebrate planktivores. Our findings elucidate the role that Bythotrephes plays in the food web and provide a novel explanation for its tendency to invade lakes of high water clarity. The importance of light-dependent predation found here may extend to other visually oriented predatory cladocerans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".