T‐cell development: an extrathymic perspective
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The lymph nodes (LNs) harbor a cryptic T-lymphopoietic pathway that is dramatically amplified by oncostatin M (OM). OM-transgenic mice generate massive amounts of T lymphocytes in the absence of Lin(-)c-Kit(hi)IL-7Ralpha- lymphoid progenitors and of reticular epithelial cells. Extrathymic T cells that develop along the OM-dependent LN pathway originate from Lin(-)c-Kit(lo)IL-7Ralpha+ lymphoid progenitors and are different from classic T cells in terms of turnover kinetics and function. Positive selection does not obey the same rules in the thymus and the LNs, where positive selection of developing T cells is supported primarily by epithelial and hematopoietic cells, respectively. Extrathymic T cells undergo enhanced homeostatic proliferation and thereby acquire some properties of memory T cells. Following antigen encounter, extrathymic T-cells initiate proliferation and cytokine secretion more readily than classic T cells, but their accumulation is limited by an exquisite susceptibility to apoptosis. Studies on in vitro and in vivo extrathymic T-cell development have yielded novel insights into the essence of a primary T-lymphoid organ. Furthermore, comparison of the thymic and OM-dependent extrathymic pathways shows how the division of labor between primary and secondary lymphoid organs influences the repertoire and homeostasis of T lymphocytes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.040 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it