Les frontières entre la vie privée et la vie professionnelle : revue jurisprudentielle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les avancées technologiques des dernières années ont permis la mise au point de diverses méthodes de surveillance qui peuvent certes être un outil fort utile pour un employeur afin de s’assurer qu’un salarié respecte diverses obligations qui lui incombent en vertu de son contrat de travail. L’utilisation de ces moyens de surveillance et la mise en preuve de leurs résultats font ressortir cependant la mince frontière existant entre la vie professionnelle du salarié et sa vie privée. Dans l’article qui suit, les auteurs examinent les critères d’application de l’article 2858 du Code civil du Québec, dont celui de la « déconsidération de l’administration de la justice ». Ils constatent que dans le contexte du système québécois de droit civil, dont l’objectif fondamental est la recherche de la vérité, c’est bien souvent le fait de ne pas accepter en preuve les résultats d’une telle surveillance qui déconsidérerait l’administration de la justice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.068 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.010 | 0.012 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".