Les frontières entre la vie privée et la vie professionnelle : revue jurisprudentielle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les avancées technologiques des dernières années ont permis la mise au point de diverses méthodes de surveillance qui peuvent certes être un outil fort utile pour un employeur afin de s’assurer qu’un salarié respecte diverses obligations qui lui incombent en vertu de son contrat de travail. L’utilisation de ces moyens de surveillance et la mise en preuve de leurs résultats font ressortir cependant la mince frontière existant entre la vie professionnelle du salarié et sa vie privée. Dans l’article qui suit, les auteurs examinent les critères d’application de l’article 2858 du Code civil du Québec, dont celui de la « déconsidération de l’administration de la justice ». Ils constatent que dans le contexte du système québécois de droit civil, dont l’objectif fondamental est la recherche de la vérité, c’est bien souvent le fait de ne pas accepter en preuve les résultats d’une telle surveillance qui déconsidérerait l’administration de la justice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".