MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072923083 · doi:10.1016/j.ejcsup.2013.07.060

Therapeutic procedures in liver metastases: Conventional and future measures

2013· review· en· W2072923083 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Cancer Supplements · 2013
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of Toronto
FundersAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology
KeywordsMedicineMagnetic resonance imagingFiducial markerRadiologyRadiation therapyPositron emission tomographyNuclear medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Background Resection of liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is associated with 5-year survival rates of 30–40%, with the possibility of cure, even in the absence of systemic therapy. This demonstration of a local therapy improving outcomes for ‘oligo-metastatic’ CRC is well accepted. Long-term survivors have also been reported following resection of liver metastases from sarcoma, renal-cell carcinoma, breast cancer and melanoma, with 5-year survival rates of 23–36% in a series of non-CRC liver metastases. Resection of neuroendocrine liver metastases has also been associated with favourable survival. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an attractive option for patients with liver metastases. Liver SBRT requires a planning computed tomography (CT) simulation scan with intravenous (IV) contrast for target definition. Multimodal imaging with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or positron emission tomography (PET) may improve target delineation. Breathing-related liver motion should be assessed by respiratory-correlated (or 4D) CT, cine-MRI or 2D kV fluoroscopy to determine appropriate planning target volume (PTV) margins. Highly conformal dose distributions are desirable using multiple beams or arcs in coplanar or non-coplanar geometries. The nominal prescribed dose should reflect the isodose that encompasses the PTV (or 95% of the PTV) with hotspots within the PTV. Immobilization of the liver using controlled breath holds, shallow breathing, abdominal compression and gating of the RT (radiation therapy) beam during specified phases of the respiratory cycle, medications and tumour tracking of implanted fiducial markers may help reduce the adverse effects of breathing motion. Image-guided RT (IGRT) based on orthogonal imaging, ultrasound or volumetric imaging such as MV or kV cone beam CT, is required at every fraction in order to reduce PTV margins for setup uncertainty. MR IGRT is an area of active research that may benefit patients requiring liver SBRT. Advantages of SBRT include increased convenience for patients. Furthermore, there are preclinical data demonstrating dose-per-fraction effects (e.g. endothelial and immune effects), with a threshold of approximately 8 Gray (Gy). Clinical experience in SBRT for liver metastases is rapidly increasing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it