MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Catheter Cryoablation of the Atrioventricular Node in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Novel Technology for Ablation of Cardiac Arrhythmias

2001· article· en· W2072946337 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCryoablationMedicineAblationAtrial fibrillationCatheter ablationIntracardiac injectionCardiologyCatheterCryosurgeryAtrioventricular blockCryotherapyInternal medicineSinus rhythmPercutaneousAtrioventricular nodeCardiac AblationSurgeryTachycardia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Recent animal studies demonstrated the feasibility and safety of applying percutaneous catheter cryoablation technology for ablation of arrhythmogenic sites. The studies also showed that reversible "ice mapping" can be performed before creating permanent lesions. We investigated the feasibility and safety of applying this new technology in man. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cryoablation of the AV node (AVN) using a 9-French quadripolar catheter with a 4-mm electrode tip was attempted in 12 patients (mean age 67.8 +/- 11.4 years) with refractory atrial fibrillation. Whereas technical issues prevented adequate tissue contact in two patients, complete AVN block was obtained in the remaining 10 patients after 4.8 +/- 1.9 cryoapplications lasting 5.5 +/- 0.2 minutes resulting in temperatures of -58.1 degrees +/- 5.4 degrees C. In all patients with sinus rhythm at the time of the procedure, cryomapping at warmer temperatures induced reversible AVN block and allowed confirmation of a successful site before definitive ablation. Intracardiac echocardiography was performed in three patients and allowed visualization of the cryocatheter-endocardial contact and cryolesion formation. No major procedural complications were reported. After 6 months of follow-up, 8 of 10 initially successful patients remained in complete block; 1 had partial recovery of AVN conduction manifested by atrial fibrillation with a slow ventricular response, and 1 fully recovered AVN conduction. CONCLUSION: (1) Catheter cryoablation of the AVN can be performed safely in man. (2) Reversible cryomapping is feasible and may offer an advantage over radiofrequency ablation. (3) Cryocatheter-endocardial contact and cryolesion growth can be monitored with intracardiac echocardiography.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.278
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it