MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072963815 · doi:10.1080/07060660209507016

Screening of<i>Brassica napus</i>against blackleg caused by<i>Leptosphaeria maculans</i>: effects of inoculum concentration, subculturing of the pathogen, and time of disease screening

2002· article· en· W2072963815 on OpenAlexaffvenue
V. K. Bansal, Peter V. Blenis, G. R. Stringam, M. R. Thiagarajah, J. P. Tewari

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlacklegLeptosphaeria maculansBrassicaCanolaBiologyCultivarPathogenHorticultureClubrootBotanyVeterinary medicineMicrobiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effects of inoculum concentration, subculturing of the pathogen, and time of disease screening on the development of blackleg disease caused by Leptosphaeria maculans were studied using the Brassica napus canola cultivars Quantum (resistant) and Profit (susceptible). Disease development was not affected by inoculum concentration in the range of 5 × 105 - 4 × 106 pycnidiospores/mL or subculturing of stock cultures of L. maculans up to 71 times on V8 juice rose Bengal agar. Disease development, however, showed seasonal variation in the greenhouse. While the disease severity values for the resistant cultivar Quantum increased during the summer, those for the susceptible cultivar Profit remained consistent throughout the year.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant PathologySame topicPlant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207