MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073010225 · doi:10.1109/isemc.2012.6351749

Small licensed transmitters and their RF exposure assessment

2012· article· en· W2073010225 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Qian Yu, Dheena Moongilan, W. S. Majkowski

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicElectromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadio frequencyRF power amplifierPower (physics)Key (lock)TelecommunicationsComputer scienceBusinessComputer securityPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deploying small cells, i.e., small licensed transmitters, is one of the key solutions to manage the recent data explosion and network congestion. Small cells are mainly deployed in residential or enterprise environments. Therefore, they can be located in close proximity to human bodies. Their RF output power is low, usually in the range of mW to a couple of watts. This paper addresses the RF exposure compliance for small cells, including regulations, criteria and rules in United States, Canada, Australia and European Union. In addition, small cells' RF safety requirement in various countries in relation to their RF output power levels is investigated. This information would not only help the designers understand the regulatory RF exposure compliance requirements for small cells thoroughly, but also provide them with guidance in determining the proper RF transmitting power levels for small cells. As a result, less time and lower cost would be required in meeting their global regulatory RF exposure assessment requirements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score0.279

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectromagnetic Fields and Biological EffectsFrench-language works237,207