Antagonistic Effects of the SRp30c Protein and Cryptic 5 ′ Splice Sites on the Alternative Splicing of the Apoptotic Regulator Bcl-x
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alternative 5' splice site selection allows Bcl-x to produce two isoforms with opposite effects on apoptosis. The pro-apoptotic Bcl-x(S) variant is up-regulated by ceramide and down-regulated by protein kinase C through specific cis-acting exonic elements, one of which is bound by SAP155. Splicing to the Bcl-x(S) 5' splice site is also enforced by heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) F/H proteins and by Sam68 in cooperation with hnRNP A1. Here, we have characterized exon elements that influence splicing to the 5' splice site of the anti-apoptotic Bcl-x(L) isoform. Within a 86-nucleotide region (B3) located immediately upstream of the Bcl-x(L) donor site we have identified two elements (ML2 and AM2) that stimulate splicing to the Bcl-x(L) 5' splice site. SRp30c binds to these elements and can shift splicing to the 5' splice site of Bcl-x(L) in an ML2/AM2-dependent manner in vitro and in vivo. The B3 region also contains an element that represses the use of Bcl-x(L). This element is bound by U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein and contains two 5' splice sites that can be used when the Bcl-x(L) 5' splice site is mutated or the ML2/AM2 elements are deleted. Conversely, mutating the cryptic 5' splice sites stimulates splicing to the Bcl-x(L) site. Thus, SRp30c stimulates splicing to the downstream 5' splice site of Bcl-x(L), thereby attenuating the repressive effect of upstream U1 snRNP binding sites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".