MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073023710 · doi:10.1142/s0217732305018438

THE RENORMALIZATION GROUP IMPROVED EFFECTIVE POTENTIAL IN MASSLESS MODELS

2005· article· en· W2073023710 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Physics Letters A · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum and Classical Electrodynamics
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMassless particleRenormalization groupLogarithmRenormalizationScalar (mathematics)Series (stratigraphy)Functional renormalization groupCoupling (piping)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effective potential V is considered in massless [Formula: see text] theory. The expansion of V in powers of the coupling λ and of the logarithm of the background field ϕ is reorganized in two ways; first as a series in λ alone, then as a series in ln ϕ alone. By applying the renormalization group (RG) equation to V, these expansions can be summed. Using the condition V′(v)=0 (where v is the vacuum expectation value of ϕ) in conjunction with the expansion of V in powers of ln ϕ fixes V provided v≠0. In this case, the dependence of V on ϕ drops out and V is not analytic in λ. Massless scalar electrodynamics is considered using the same approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.688
Threshold uncertainty score0.587

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it