MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073028536 · doi:10.1093/jts/flt213

Paul's Letter to the Philippians: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary. By BEN WITHERINGTON III.

2013· article· en· W2073028536 on OpenAlex
David A. Neufeld

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Theological Studies · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicBiblical Studies and Interpretation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRhetorical questionHistoryTheologyClassicsPhilosophyArtLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal Article Paul’s Letter to the Philippians: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary. By Ben Witherington III. Get access Paul’s Letter to the Philippians: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary. By Ben Witherington III. Pp. xxix + 312. Grand Rapids, MI and Cambridge, UK: William B. Eerdmans, 2011. isbn9780 8028 0143 2. Paper $38/£25.99. Dietmar Neufeld Dietmar Neufeld University of British Columbia Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Journal of Theological Studies, Volume 65, Issue 1, April 2014, Pages 226–228, https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/flt213 Published: 24 December 2013

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.689
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it