Statistical Rate Theory Examination of Ethanol Evaporation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of low-temperature (246 < T(I)(L) < 267 K) steady-state ethanol evaporation experiments have been conducted to determine the saturation vapor pressure of metastable ethanol. The measured interfacial conditions have been used with statistical rate theory (SRT) to develop an expression for the saturation vapor pressure as a function of temperature, f(srt)(eth). This expression is shown to be thermodynamically consistent because it gives predictions of both the evaporative latent heat and the liquid constant-pressure specific heat that are in agreement with independent measurements of these properties. In each experiment, the interfacial vapor temperature was measured to be greater than the interfacial liquid temperature, [triple bond]DeltaT(I)(LV). When f(srt)(eth) is used in SRT to predict DeltaT(I)(LV), the results are shown to be consistent with the measurements. Other expressions for the saturation vapor pressure that are in the literature are examined and found to be thermodynamically inconsistent and do not lead to valid predictions of DeltaT(I)(LV).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".