MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073044751 · doi:10.1137/s1052623499360616

Erratum: Weak Sharp Solutions of Variational Inequalities

2000· erratum· en· W2073044751 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Optimization · 2000
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptimization and Variational Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsLine (geometry)Simple (philosophy)Statement (logic)InequalityVariational inequalityCalculus (dental)CombinatoricsMathematical economicsPure mathematicsApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisGeometryPhilosophyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Xuexiang Huang pointed out that the statement on line 5 of page 184 of [P. Marcotte and D. Zhu, SIAM J. Optim., 9 (1999), pp. 179--189] is invalid, and supplied an alternative proof of the inequality that appears on line 10. Here is a simple proof of this result due to an anonymous referee. The substitution starts at line 4 and ends at line 11.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.420
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it