The effect of motion on wind tunnel drag measurement for athletes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To optimize the reduction of the drag area coefficient of a speed skater, mannequins in static positions wearing suits were tested in the NRC 2m × 3m Wind Tunnel to find the lowest drag for a given range of speeds. The results obtained from this study can only be interpreted and applied to a speed skater if the aerodynamic drag coefficient is not affected significantly by the motion of the skater. It has been assumed that, for a representative cadence or frequency of oscillation of a speed skater lower than 1 Hz which is representative of the motion in a race, the aerodynamics could be considered quasi-stationary. The quasi-steady state is defined by the flow that developed around the body and the wake both governing the aerodynamic drag compared to the contribution of the low frequency of oscillation of the body. To verify this hypothesis and to determine to what extent the quasi-steady assumption is valid for a human body in a speed skating position, a study was carried out in a wind tunnel using a moving life-size mannequin. A mechanism was devised so that a mannequin in a sidepush position could be oscillated to mimic the sinusoidal path of a speed skater. The amplitude of motion was kept constant and the frequencies of oscillation and wind speeds were changed to cover the equivalent of 500 m to 10,000 m races. The experiments have revealed that the variations of the drag area coefficient with wind speed were similar for static positions and for cases where the mannequin was oscillating at frequencies lower than 0.67 Hz or for a period of rotation of 1.5 s. The drag reduction occurred at the same wind speeds for the static and dynamic cases. This paper presents details of the experiments and a summary of the main findings. © 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it