MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073077800 · doi:10.1117/12.478256

Double-sided MEMS mirror for L-switching matrix

2003· article· en· W2073077800 on OpenAlexaff
T.W. Yeow, K. L. Eddie Law, A.A. Goldenberg

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSilicon on insulatorMaterials scienceMicroelectromechanical systemsDeep reactive-ion etchingWaferFabricationOptoelectronicsBulk micromachiningSurface micromachiningSilicon nitrideTorsion springTorsion (gastropod)Layer (electronics)SiliconEtching (microfabrication)NanotechnologyReactive-ion etchingMechanical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SOI wafers are finding increasing applications in MEMS devices. The device Si, buried oxide, and handle Si layers provide mechanical and structural properties to create more complex 3D free standing structures. This paper presents the fabrication process of double-sided mirror by using surface and bulk micromachining of SOI wafers. Silicon nitride thin firms are deposited on device layer of SOI to provide torsion bar material of the mirror. Device layer provides single crystal Si mechanical reinforcement to counteract the stress associated with silicon nitride. The underlying buried oxide acts as an etch-stop layer during DRIE of the Si handle layer and sacrificial layer for releasing the torsion bars. The dimensions of the mirror are 250um by 500um suspended by two torsion bars that are 350um by 6um by 0.4um.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207