Alkaline extraction of xylan from wood using microwave and conventional heating
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT This study aims to investigate the effect of microwave heating versus conventional heating for the alkaline hydrolysis of xylan from birch wood to understand the effect of the heating process on the dissolution of wood, the yield of xylan, and the degree of polymerization of the isolated xylan. The results indicate that the rate of wood dissolution is significantly higher (0.020/s) during microwave extraction than the conventional extraction (0.001/s). Wood solubilization, after an initial rapid removal of damaged fibers, is linear with time for both conventional and microwave extraction, with microwave showing a rate 20 times faster. The yield of xylan reaches a limit of about 60% for both processes but then declines slowly as thermal degradation become significant. Microwave heating provides 60% yield in 1/10th the time of the conventional process. This is found to be associated with the rapid temperature rise, and also with local “hot spots” generated during microwave treatment. The results indicated that xylan degradation was significant above 95°C. The nature of the isolated xylan was different for the two heating methods: the xylan isolated using microwave extraction for 20 min exhibits higher molecular weight (i.e., a greater degree of polymerization, about 150) than the xylan isolated using conventional extraction for the same duration (degree of polymerization, about 124) demonstrating the effectiveness of microwave heating for extraction of xylan from wood. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015 , 132 , 41330.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".