Mettre en scène l’altérité : stratégies, enjeux et contraintes. Le point de vue des « commerçants africains » en milieu urbain1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article interroge le travail de l’identité et de l’altérité dans le cadre du marché de la consommation ethnique en France, du point de vue des interactions marchandes. Il se fonde sur une enquête de terrain de longue durée menée dans la région Poitou-Charentes auprès de migrants originaires d’Afrique subsaharienne. L’objectif de cet article suit deux axes : le premier rappelle l’urgence de rompre avec toute définition essentialiste de l’ethnicité. Le second interroge la manière dont les commerçants africains travaillent avec nos images de l’altérité et réinterprètent des signifiants culturels en fonction de la définition de la situation dans laquelle ils se trouvent et des relations sociales en cours. À partir d’une analyse comparée entre trois aires situationnelles (marchés forains, africains, de festivals), nous chercherons à éclairer la variation des stratégies identitaires, en prenant en compte leurs enjeux et leurs contraintes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".