MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073121550 · doi:10.1061/9780784479117.019

Heavy Rail below the 100-Year Flood Elevation—Innovations in Design: A Case Study

2015· article· en· W2073121550 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brian S. Maxwell, Howard A. Wells

Bibliographic record

VenueStructures Congress 2015 · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlood mythPort (circuit theory)TrainCivil engineeringRail transportationMetreEnvironmental scienceBridge (graph theory)Transport engineeringEngineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To decouple the heavy rail entrance into the Port of Vancouver USA from a major north/south mainline of the nation’s rail system, a rail-under-rail grade-separation structure was designed along the northern bank of the Columbia River in Vancouver, Washington. To provide the required 23.5 foot (7.2 meter) clearance below an existing 100-year old rail bridge that crosses the river, the new rail line needed to descend more than 14 feet (4.3 meters) below the 100-year flood elevation. Because trains need to remain in operation during this flood condition, protection of the rail line from flood waters was required. Several innovative design solutions were developed to meet this design criteria in the most efficient manner. This case study is of regional, national, and international interest. The paper will discuss the project’s constraints, design challenges, and solutions utilized to meet the project criteria. The location and configuration of the structure posed special challenges and the solutions for this project will be of interest to practicing structural engineers as well as rail operators, owners, and land use professionals. The rail structure itself, a 1,350-foot (411.5 meter) long portion of the new rail entrance for the port, is a partially elevated reinforced concrete structure that protects the rail from flood waters and supports it along the irregular river bank. To resist flood waters, a continuous reinforced concrete U-shaped trench was selected as the optimal solution. This selection of structure type was the first of many challenges for this project. The superstructure borrows design innovations from the continuously reinforced concrete pavement industry to help eliminate expansion joints over the entire length of the structure. This helps minimize water infiltration during flood events and reduces lifetime maintenance costs. The substructure consists of closely spaced driven steel batter piles that support the majority of the rail trench structure and is extremely compatible with the expansion joint-free design. The new rail trench structure provides a unique facility that meets the design challenges of the site, maximizes operational efficiency for the port, and relieves congestion at this critical location along the Pacific Northwest’s high-speed rail corridor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStructures Congress 2015Same topicStructural Engineering and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207