MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073121550 · doi:10.1061/9780784479117.019

Heavy Rail below the 100-Year Flood Elevation—Innovations in Design: A Case Study

2015· article· en· W2073121550 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueStructures Congress 2015 · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlood mythPort (circuit theory)TrainCivil engineeringRail transportationMetreEnvironmental scienceBridge (graph theory)Transport engineeringEngineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To decouple the heavy rail entrance into the Port of Vancouver USA from a major north/south mainline of the nation’s rail system, a rail-under-rail grade-separation structure was designed along the northern bank of the Columbia River in Vancouver, Washington. To provide the required 23.5 foot (7.2 meter) clearance below an existing 100-year old rail bridge that crosses the river, the new rail line needed to descend more than 14 feet (4.3 meters) below the 100-year flood elevation. Because trains need to remain in operation during this flood condition, protection of the rail line from flood waters was required. Several innovative design solutions were developed to meet this design criteria in the most efficient manner. This case study is of regional, national, and international interest. The paper will discuss the project’s constraints, design challenges, and solutions utilized to meet the project criteria. The location and configuration of the structure posed special challenges and the solutions for this project will be of interest to practicing structural engineers as well as rail operators, owners, and land use professionals. The rail structure itself, a 1,350-foot (411.5 meter) long portion of the new rail entrance for the port, is a partially elevated reinforced concrete structure that protects the rail from flood waters and supports it along the irregular river bank. To resist flood waters, a continuous reinforced concrete U-shaped trench was selected as the optimal solution. This selection of structure type was the first of many challenges for this project. The superstructure borrows design innovations from the continuously reinforced concrete pavement industry to help eliminate expansion joints over the entire length of the structure. This helps minimize water infiltration during flood events and reduces lifetime maintenance costs. The substructure consists of closely spaced driven steel batter piles that support the majority of the rail trench structure and is extremely compatible with the expansion joint-free design. The new rail trench structure provides a unique facility that meets the design challenges of the site, maximizes operational efficiency for the port, and relieves congestion at this critical location along the Pacific Northwest’s high-speed rail corridor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.678

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it