MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073125644 · doi:10.1109/lawp.2013.2251313

Rapid RWG Moment Method Solution of EFIE for Multiscale Problems via Hierarchical Center of Radiation Approximation in Barnes–Hut Algorithm

2013· article· en· W2073125644 on OpenAlexaff
Khalid Butt, Vladimir Okhmatovski

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicElectromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterpolation (computer graphics)Method of moments (probability theory)Moment (physics)AlgorithmDiscretizationApproximation algorithmElectric-field integral equationMathematicsPosition (finance)Computer scienceIntegral equationMathematical analysisPhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Barnes-Hut algorithm utilizing hierarchical center-of-radiation approximation is applied for acceleration of quasi-static interactions in RWG Moment Method discretization of the electric field integral equation. As the method uses imbalanced oct-tree in hierarchical partitioning of the model, it maintains efficiency in memory and CPU usage when geometry of about a wavelength in size presents multiscale features. Because the center-of-radiation position in each box of hierarchically partitioned space is dependent on the direction to the observation point, the field evaluation in the Barnes-Hut algorithm is done via an interpolation scheme. Augmentation of the Barnes-Hut algorithm with local interpolation schemes is demonstrated. Impact on the error control mechanisms via angular interpolation and source clustering distance on the efficiency of the algorithm is studied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score0.458

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation LettersSame topicElectromagnetic Scattering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207