MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073132129 · doi:10.1002/etc.5620190906

Steady-state concentrations of carbonate radicals in field waters

2000· article· en· W2073132129 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAdvanced oxidation water treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarbonateEnvironmental chemistryRadicalEnvironmental scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The carbonate radical [•CO−3] is a secondary radical that results from the scavenging of hydroxyl radical (•OH) by carbonate/bicarbonate. N,N-dimethylaniline was found to be a selective probe for measuring the steady-state concentration of this radical in a variety of natural waters. The pH, nitrate, total carbonate/bicarbonate, and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in selected field waters were quantitatively analyzed. It was assumed that hydroxyl radicals were produced primarily from the slow photolysis of nitrate and DOC and then were scavenged by carbonate/bicarbonate that were competing with DOC. Steady-state carbonate radical concentrations [•CO−3]ss in natural waters were measured by irradiating solutions of natural waters containing N,N-dimethylaniline in a photoreactor with varying intensity as well as using natural sunlight. The measured steady-state concentration of carbonate radicals was found to be strongly dependent on light intensity and ranged from 5 × 10−15 to 10−13 M. Further kinetic analysis of the data showed that carbonate radical concentrations were related to the concentrations of nitrate and dissolved organic carbon in natural waters through a simple linear relationship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it