Feature Motion for Monocular Robot Navigation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Monocular vision based robot navigation requires feature tracking for localization. In this paper we present a tracking system using discriminative features as well as less discriminative features. Discriminative features such as SIFT are easily tracked and useful to obtain the initial estimates of the transforms such as affinities and homographies. On the other hand less discriminative features such as Harris corners and manually selected features are not easily tracked in a subsequent frame due to problems in matching. We use SIFT features to obtain the the estimates of the planar homographies representing the motion of the major planar structures in the scene. Planar structure assumption is valid for indoor and architectural scenes. The combination of discriminative and less discriminative feature are tracked using the prediction by these homographies. Then normalized cross correlation matching is used to find the exact matches. This produces robust matching and feature motion can be accurately estimated. We show the performance of our system with real image sequences.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it