Staged Transcrusal and Transsphenoidal Endoscopic Resection of an Atypical Clival Melanoma: A Case Report and Literature Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a case of an atypical clival meningeal melanoma treated with a multidisciplinary staged transcrusal and transsphenoidal endoscopic surgical approach. A 45-year-old woman presented with a 15-month history of visual symptoms, neck pain, and unsteadiness. Magnetic resonance imaging of the head revealed a clival mass with both intracranial and extracranial involvement. Endoscopic clival biopsy suggested a melanocytic tumor. Extensive imaging and dermatological workup did not demonstrate a primary source. A multidisciplinary staged surgical resection included a transcrusal approach to resect the intracranial component, followed by transsphenoidal endoscopic resection of the extracranial component. Postoperatively, she received adjuvant radiation. At 1 year following surgery, the patient retains full preservation of hearing, facial nerve function, and extraocular movements. To our knowledge, this is the first case report of a combined surgical approach for a primary clival meningitic melanoma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".