MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073164974 · doi:10.1139/b06-024

Two distinct fungi colonize roots and rhizomes of the myco-heterotrophic <i>Afrothismia gesnerioides</i> (Burmanniaceae)

2006· article· en· W2073164974 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Stephan Imhof

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Botany · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyphaBiologyRhizomeBotanyFungusEndodermisEpidermis (zoology)ParenchymaMycorrhizaColonizationMyceliumSymbiosisMicrobiologyAnatomyBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The subterranean organs of Afrothismia gesnerioides H. Maas consist of short rhizomes densely covered with ovoid root tubercles, each of which may extend into a short filiform root extension. Serial sections revealed the presence of two distinct fungi occupying different niches within the plant tissues. Rhizomes and roots are divided into separate compartments hosting different morphotypes of the aseptate, exclusively intracellular hyphae of fungus A: (i) straight and persistent hyphae in the root epidermis, root extension, and outer rhizome cortex, (ii) coiled but still persistent hyphae in the third root layer, (iii) coiled hyphae undergoing degeneration in the root cortical parenchyma, (iv) starch depositions in the inner rhizome cortex and no colonization by fungus A, and (v) a partly collapsed root hypodermis serving as compartment barrier. The colonization by fungus A is interpreted as an aberrant arbuscular mycorrhiza of the Paris type. The compartmentation allows the separation of tissues where the hyphae stay functional from those in which the fungal material is digested. This pattern may represent a complex but efficient strategy for a sustained benefit from the few fungal penetrations that occur. Comparison with earlier work on Afrothismia winkleri (Engl.) Schltr. revealed considerable differences between the mycorrhizae that are interpreted as evolutionary steps. There are signs that these changes even may have improved the mycorrhizal benefit for the plant. The monomorphic hyphae of fungus B are smaller in diameter, septate, grow inter- as well as intra-cellularly, but are always characteristically appressed to the inner cell walls. It does not change its appearance within the root/rhizome compartments as does fungus A. Neither hyphal degeneration nor interferences with fungus A, starch depositions, or alterations in the development of A. gesnerioides could be noticed. Fungus B possibly is a commensal, but relevance to the symbiosis cannot be ruled out.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of BotanySame topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsFrench-language works237,207