Clinical Evaluation of Two Weekly Dose Schedules of ‘IC-140’
Bibliographic record
Abstract
53 patients with intractable malignant diseases that were treated with a new alkylating agent, 4-N,N-bis (2-chloroethyl) amino phenyl N (P-carboxyphenyl) carbanate, also knows as 'IC-140' were evaluated. The records of an additional 41 patients entered on this study could not be assessed from the standpoint of toxicity. At the dose level of 150 mg/m2/week, severe leukopenia (less than 2,000) and thrombocytopenia ( less than 75,000) were encountered in 23 of 34 patients. On the other hand, at the 100 mg/m2/week dose level, the severe toxicity was reduced to 8 out of 19 patients. Tumor response was evaluated in 43 patients. The overall response was 23% (29% at the 150 mg/m2, 13% at the 100 mg/m2) and the duration of the response varied from 3 to 32 weeks with a mean duration of 13 weeks. Responses were noted in patients with ovarian, renal, lung, hepatic, breast carcinomas and lymphosarcoma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".