MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Grain coarsening in Ti – 45Al based titanium aluminides at supertransus temperature and subsequent lamellar structure formation

2004· article· en· W2073190419 on OpenAlexfundno aff
U. Prasad, M.C. Chaturvedi

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials Science and Technology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIntermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceLamellar structureMicrostructureAnnealing (glass)Grain sizeGrain growthTitaniumMetallurgyGrain boundary

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The phenomenon of grain growth in the α phase field and the effect of annealing time/grain size on the formation of lamellar microstructure upon subsequent cooling was studied in Ti - 45Al - 2Nb - 0.4Mn and Ti- 45Al - 2Nb alloys. The grain size of both alloys increased with annealing time and the grain growth exponent of Ti - 45Al - 2Nb- 0.4Mn and Ti - 45Al- 2Nb at 1350°C was observed to be 0.52 and 0.38, respectively. The difference in the grain growth exponent values has been attributed to the initial grain size and the grain boundary morphology. Interlamellar spacing in the lamellar microstructure, which formed upon furnace cooling from the α phase field, was also observed to increase with increase in annealing time, i.e. interlamellar spacing increased with increase in grain size.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials Science and TechnologySame topicIntermetallics and Advanced Alloy PropertiesFrench-language works237,207