Exchange of short‐chain monocarboxylic acids by vegetation at a remote tropical forest site in Amazonia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As part of the project LBA‐EUSTACH (European Studies on Trace gases and Atmospheric Chemistry as a contribution to the Large‐Scale Biosphere‐Atmosphere experiment in Amazonia), the exchange of formic acid and acetic acid between vegetation and the atmosphere was investigated in the wet‐to‐dry season transition and the dry‐to‐wet season transition periods in 1999 in Rondônia, Brazil. Direct exchange measurements on the branch level mainly exhibited uptake of formic acid and acetic acid for all plant species in both seasons, although diel, seasonal, and interspecies variations were observed. Even though other physiological and physico‐chemical parameters may have contributed, the uptake of organic acids was found to be primarily a function of the ambient atmospheric mixing ratios. The linear dependence suggests a bidirectional exchange behavior of the plants and calculated deposition velocities (0.17–0.23 cm s−1), compensation point mixing ratios (0.16–0.30 ppb), and potential emission rates under purified air conditions (0.013–0.031 nmol m−2 s−1) are discussed. Vertical profile measurements in and above the primary forest canopy further strengthened the assumption that the forest is rather a sink than a source for organic acids. The generally lower mixing ratios observed within the canopy were indicative of an uptake by vegetation and/or the soil surface. Continuous measurements of the ambient atmospheric mixing ratios at the canopy top revealed strong diel variations in both seasons and a marked seasonality with higher mixing ratios during the dry season, both being mirrored in the variation of observed uptake rates of the plants. High atmospheric concentrations during the dry season were attributed to biomass burning. During the wet season, when biomass burning activity was low, indirect emission by the vegetation, i.e., photochemical oxidation of primarily emitted biogenic reactive hydrocarbons, was assumed to dominantly contribute to the atmospheric burden of the organic acids. The high degree of correlation between atmospheric formic acid and acetic acid indicated that similar atmospheric processes were affecting their mixing ratios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".