Follicular Atresia and Luteolysis Evidence of a Role for N‐Cadherin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studies suggest that cell-cell interactions may regulate apoptosis; and, in particular, the calcium-dependent cell adhesion molecule N-cadherin has been shown to be capable of modulating this process. Here, we review the evidence that N-cadherin is expressed by human granulosa cells (GCs) and mediates cell-cell adhesion between GCs. There is strong correlation between N-cadherin expression by granulosa or luteal cells and follicular survival in isolated follicles and archival tissue sections. There exists a strong expression of the molecule by GCs in follicles of the resting pool, of growing antral follicles, and of healthy corpora lutea. In contrast, the molecule is lost in degenerating GCs of atretic follicles and in luteal cells of the late luteal phase. Further, the experimental evidence demonstrates that cell-cell adhesion is critical to the survival of GCs and that N-cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion is a critical mediator of survival signals and inhibits apoptosis in these cells. Possible mechanisms by which apoptosis may be triggerred in GCs include the downregulation of N-cadherin, which is mediated, at least in part, through the enzymatic cleavage of the extracellular domain of the molecule. Collectively, these observations suggest that downregulation of N-cadherin or the absence of a functional extracellular domain of the molecule prevent GC aggregation and is associated with GC apoptosis. We propose that N-cadherin-mediated GC signaling plays a central role in follicular and luteal cell survival.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".