MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073212900 · doi:10.1063/1.1503355

Interfacial gravity currents. II. Wave excitation

2002· article· en· W2073212900 on OpenAlexafffund
Akansha Mehta, Bruce Sutherland, PATRICK J. KYBA

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsAmplitudeInternal waveIntrusionFront (military)ExcitationMechanicsGravity waveGravity currentGravitational waveStratified flowsCurrent (fluid)Layer (electronics)Condensed matter physicsStratified flowOpticsAstrophysicsGeologyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We examine the response of a two- and three-layer salt-stratified fluid to the collapse of a mixed region intruding along the middle layer. For sufficiently deep middle layers, the intrusion (an interfacial gravity current) excites a double-humped solitary wave appearing in the interfacial layer in front of the intrusion head. When the solitary wave is generated the current stops propagating. Trailing the intrusion are large-amplitude trapped internal waves. We study the effect of middle-layer depth and density difference to determine the conditions under which a solitary wave is generated. We propose that this transition occurs because the intrusion resonantly couples with trapped internal waves for a sufficiently thick interface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207