MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073222885 · doi:10.5589/q05-009

Recent Improvements to the NRC 9 m × 9 m Wind Tunnel

2005· article· en· W2073222885 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Việt Dũng Nguyễn, Bernard Tanguay, Y. Mébarki, M. Deslauriers, Ali Rebaine, Yves Cronier, S. Bisson, L. Del Ciotto, C. Legare, Stuart Rutherford, O. E. Underhill, Christopher J. Mathias, Deukki Lee, L Smyth

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian aeronautics and space journal · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerospace and Aviation Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWind tunnelUpgradeEngineeringWakeMarine engineeringTurbulenceAutomotive engineeringAerospace engineeringMechanical engineeringMeteorologyPhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A brief overview of the facility's operational capabilities and testing techniques is provided. Recent improvements to the wind tunnel are discussed: (i) the installation and commissioning of a new twelve-pulse variable speed 8 MW fan drive, (ii) the overhaul of the tunnel's mechanical fan drive circuit and the tunnel's cooling water pump, and (iii) the development of measurement techniques such as the wake-scanning rigs, quick load check apparatus, and the use of infra-red cameras in the detection of laminar-turbulent transition on models. Future upgrade plans for expanded utilization of the wind tunnel for aircraft development are outlined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian aeronautics and space journalSame topicAerospace and Aviation TechnologyFrench-language works237,207