MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073296897 · doi:10.1002/hyp.323

The impact of climate change on seasonal floods of a southern Quebec River Basin

2001· article· en· W2073296897 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueHydrological Processes · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieurePolytechnique MontréalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)HydrographClimate changeFlood mythFlooding (psychology)PrecipitationDrainage basinReturn periodSurface runoffStructural basinWater resourcesClimatologyGeologyGeographyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Global warming predicted by general circulation models (GCM) is now a more and more generally agreed upon effect. The impact of climate change on summer and fall flooding on the Châteauguay River Basin (2500 km 2 ), located at the southern end of the Quebec province (Canada), was investigated using results from the Canadian GCM (CGCM1) and a coupled hydrology–hydraulics model of the basin. Three 20‐year periods, corresponding to 1975–1995, 2020–2040 and 2080–2100, were used for the analysis. For each period, 24‐h precipitation depths corresponding to the 20 and 100‐year return periods were determined from a frequency analysis of the summer–fall maximum 24‐h precipitations using a general extreme value frequency distribution. 24‐h rainfall hyetographs were generated using region‐specific cumulative distributions provided by the Canadian Atmospheric Environment Service. These hyetographs were then used as inputs to the hydrology–hydraulics model to simulate hydrographs, maximum discharge and maximum water levels at two sections of the river. Results indicate potentially very serious increases in the volume of runoff, maximum discharge and water level with future climate change scenarios. The changes get more drastic as longer return periods are considered. Increases of up to 250% of the maximum water discharge are encountered and water levels are significantly higher than the current flood levels. If realistic, these scenarios indicate that important decisions will have to be taken to alleviate future increases in flooding damages in what is already a flood prone river. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.819

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it