Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nous analysons dans cet article L’Attente l’oubli de Maurice Blanchot, tentant de montrer comment s’y articulent les liens de la mémoire et de l’oubli. La métaphore du labyrinthe nous permettra d’illustrer le concept de musement, proposé initialement par C. S. Peirce, et nous servira à comprendre comment des souvenirs peuvent être perdus puis récupérés, si tant est qu’ils puissent l’être. Le narrateur de L’Attente l’oubli est dans une relation presque clinique avec cette femme qu’il veut aider. Or, il doit apprendre, s’il veut récupérer le fil de ses souvenirs, à ne pas écouter ce qu’elle lui dit, à ne pas s’arrêter aux mots qu’elle énonce et à leur signification, mais à écouter au-delà des mots, là où le ton devient signifiant. C’est dans la tonalité que se cache la vérité de l’être.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".