MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073371923 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.85.092011

Measurement of the masses and widths of the bottom baryons<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">b</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:math>and<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math>

2012· article· lv· W2073371923 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology · 2012
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFermilabIstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareRussian Foundation for Basic ResearchAcademy of FinlandNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlfred P. Sloan FoundationNational Science CouncilMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNational Research FoundationNational Science FoundationRoyal SocietyAustralian Research CouncilNational Research Foundation of KoreaSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsLine (geometry)Primer (cosmetics)Sample (material)Field (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using data from $p\overline{p}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=1.96\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{TeV}$ recorded by the CDF II detector at the Fermilab Tevatron, we present improved measurements of the masses and first measurements of natural widths of the four bottom baryon resonance states ${\ensuremath{\Sigma}}_{b}^{+}$, ${\ensuremath{\Sigma}}_{b}^{*+}$ and ${\ensuremath{\Sigma}}_{b}^{\ensuremath{-}}$, ${\ensuremath{\Sigma}}_{b}^{*\ensuremath{-}}$. These states are fully reconstructed in their decay modes to ${\ensuremath{\Lambda}}_{b}^{0}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}}$ where ${\ensuremath{\Lambda}}_{b}^{0}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}_{c}^{+}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ with ${\ensuremath{\Lambda}}_{c}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}p{K}^{\ensuremath{-}}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{+}$. The analysis is based on a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of $6.0\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{fb}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ collected by an online event selection based on tracks displaced from the $p\overline{p}$ interaction point.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmologySame topicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsFrench-language works237,207