MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073373473 · doi:10.1063/1.1865329

Design and holographic fabrication of tetragonal and cubic photonic crystals with phase mask: toward the mass-production of three-dimensional photonic crystals

2005· article· en· W2073373473 on OpenAlexaff
Yuankun Lin, Peter R. Herman, Kristof Darmawikarta

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhotonic Crystals and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotonic crystalFabricationPhotoresistMaterials scienceYablonovitePhotonicsTetragonal crystal systemLithographyOptoelectronicsInterference lithographyHolographyPhase (matter)Photonic metamaterialPhotolithographyPhotonic integrated circuitOpticsNanotechnologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present design and holographic fabrication of the woodpile-type photonic crystals through phase mask techniques. Three-dimensional photonic crystal structures with tetragonal or cubic symmetries are fabricable by exposing the photoresist to the interference patterns generated by the phase masks. These photonic crystals have full photonic band gaps as large as 27% of the gap center frequency if made from silicon. The realized photonic crystal in SU-8 photoresist shows overlapped thus more stable woodpile-type structures. The phase-mask based lithography for the fabrication of the photonic crystals, together with the computer-controlled fabrication process, could take advantage of the standard tools of the electronics industry, leading toward the mass-production of the three-dimensional photonic crystals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations97
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicPhotonic Crystals and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207