MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073375464 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2013-2199

Abstract 2199: Associations of genetic polymorphisms in <i>VEGFR1</i> with progression-free and overall survival in patients with neuroendocrine tumors treated with the VEGFA inhibitor bevacizumab.

2013· article· en· W2073375464 on OpenAlexaff
Monica Ter‐Minassian, Zhirong Qian, Jennifer A. Chan, Susanne M. Hooshmand, Lauren K. Brais, Rachel Heafield, Xihong Lin, Geoffrey Liu, David C. Christiani, Matthew H. Kulke

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBevacizumabSingle-nucleotide polymorphismInternal medicineOncologyHazard ratioProportional hazards modelMedicineProgression-free survivalGenotypingMinor allele frequencyVascular endothelial growth factor AGenotypeVascular endothelial growth factorBiologyChemotherapyVEGF receptorsConfidence intervalGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) have been shown to be responsive to treatment with VEGF pathway inhibitors. We hypothesized that genetic variation in VEGFA, VEGFR1 or VEGFR2 is associated with progression free survival (PFS) and/or overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic NET treated with bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting VEGFA. Methods: We selected 61 functional and tagging SNPs with a minor allele frequency of 5% or greater, with full gene coverage of VEGFA, VEGFR1 and VEGFR2. We pooled data from two genotyped datasets, selecting 82 patients with metastatic NET who received bevacizumab administered either as a single agent or as part of a combination regimen. Using a Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, and an additive genetic model, we tested the SNPs’ associations with PFS and OS adjusting for age and stage at diagnosis, gender, tumor origin, grade of differentiation, and genotyping dataset. Results: We found that 4 intronic tagging SNPs in VEGFR1, rs7987649, rs9508021, rs9513095 and rs2104330 were associated with PFS at p<0.05. The association between rs7987649 and PFS (multivariate Hazard Ratio 0.55 (0.38, 0.81) p=0.002) remained significant after adjusting for multiple testing. One of the four SNPs associated with PFS, rs7987649, as well as another SNP in VEGFR1, rs3794339, were associated with OS at p<0.05 although these associations did not remain significant after multiple testing adjustment. No SNPs in either VEGFR2 or VEGFA were associated with PFS or OS. Conclusions: In patients with neuroendocrine tumors treated with bevacizumab, the VEGFR1 SNP rs7987649 appears to be associated with progression-free survival. We note that three SNPs identified in our analysis, rs9508021, rs9513095 and rs2104330, are in strong linkage disequilibrium with SNPs rs7993418 and rs9582036, which have been associated with increased VEGFR1 expression and with PFS and OS in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (Lambrechts, 2012). Further study of loci within this region of VEGFR1 is warranted to discover potential causal variants affecting NET survival. Citation Format: Monica Ter-Minassian, ZhiRong R. Qian, Jennifer A. Chan, Susanne M. Hooshmand, Lauren K. Brais, Rachel Heafield, Xihong Lin, Geoffrey Liu, David C. Christiani, Matthew H. Kulke. Associations of genetic polymorphisms in VEGFR1 with progression-free and overall survival in patients with neuroendocrine tumors treated with the VEGFA inhibitor bevacizumab. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2199. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-2199

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicNeuroendocrine Tumor Research AdvancesFrench-language works237,207