Aspects de l’évolution des coutumes ancestrales dans le Droit public des chefferies traditionnelles au Cameroun
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le principe de la négation du droit public indigène érigé en dogme du droit public moderne au Cameroun depuis la période d’occupation française subit, voici maintenant plus d’une vingtaine d’années, une lente transformation dans une relative indifférence de la doctrine. Les chefferies traditionnelles du Décret n° 77/245 du 15 juillet 1977 illustrent cette reprise en main des normes coutumières en droit public interne. Cet article montre comment à partir d’un dispositif législatif fermé, le juge administratif a su dégager les normes coutumières du droit public des chefferies traditionnelles. Il analyse les limites de cette opération de résurrection des coutumes, d’abord par le biais de contrôles administratifs, puis au moyen de contrôles jurisprudentiels. Un tel effort de création du droit inspirée de la culture locale est la preuve que le droit public interne tire également sa source juridique de la coutume, et non plus exclusivement de la Constitution, de la loi et des principes généraux de droit comme certains continuent de l’écrire et de l’enseigner.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".