MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Liposomal encapsulation significantly enchances the immunosuppressive effect of tacrolimus in a discordant islet xenotransplant model1

2002· article· en· W2073430355 on OpenAlexaff
Hua Yang, Vivian C. McAlister, Ayman Al‐Jazaeri, James R. Wright

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplantation · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreDalhousie UniversityNova Scotia Health AuthorityIzaak Walton Killam Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTacrolimusIsletTransplantationAndrologyBiodistributionXenotransplantationPharmacologyMedicineChemistryInternal medicineImmunologyEndocrinologyDiabetes mellitusIn vitroBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Encapsulation of tacrolimus (TAC) in a lipid bilayer to form liposome-encapsulated tacrolimus (LTAC) alters the biodistribution profile, half-life, and efficacy in organ allotransplantation models. LTAC has not been applied to either cell transplantation or xenotransplantation. METHODS: To test the efficacy of LTAC in a discordant islet xenograft model, tilapia (fish) islets were transplanted under the left kidney capsules of streptozotocin-diabetic Balb/c mice. Recipient mice (groups I-VI) were treated with: I, untreated; II, empty liposomes; III, TAC (2 mg/kg/day); IV, TAC (5 mg/kg/day); V, LTAC (2 mg/kg/day); or VI, LTAC (5 mg/kg/day); all treatments were for 35 days or until rejection (i.e., two glucose measurements >200 mg/dl). Graft-bearing kidneys were removed for histology after rejection. RESULTS: Mean graft survival time (mGST) for control groups I and II were 6.7+/-1.4 (n=6) and 7.5+/-1.3 days (n=4), respectively. Daily TAC treatment at 2 mg/kg/d (III) did not prolong graft function (mGST=7.7+/-1.6; n=6) although 5 mg/kg/day (IV) produced minimal prolongation to 12.8+/-4.8 days (n=12). Treatment with LTAC at 2 mg/kg/day (V) significantly prolonged mGST to 26.6+/-4.9 (n=5); however, all recipients rejected during treatment (i.e.,<35 days). LTAC at 5 mg/kg/day (VI) further prolonged mGST to 39.9+/-11.8 days (n=12) with only one mouse rejecting before day 35. Histologically, at the time of functional rejection, grafts were generally either totally or partially effaced by mononuclear cells, eosinophils, and fibrosis. In groups VI, islet grafts removed from two mice that died while they were normoglycemic and from a mouse terminated while it was normoglycemic at day 36 were viable, well-granulated, and free from cellular infiltration. The group VI grafts examined at rejection (i.e., 1-2 weeks after discontinuing LTAC) were generally totally obliterated and were in two instances associated with nodular aggregates of atypical lymphocytes resembling posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder. CONCLUSIONS: LTAC is the most potent immunosuppressive compound we have tested in our discordant fish-to-mouse islet xenograft model; however, toxicity is an issue at high doses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransplantationSame topicPancreatic function and diabetesFrench-language works237,207