MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073431430 · doi:10.1179/026708307x232875

Effect of filler alloy composition on post-weld heat treatment cracking in GTA welded cast Inconel 738LC superalloy

2008· article· en· W2073431430 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials Science and Technology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh Temperature Alloys and Creep
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsMaterials scienceMetallurgyCrackingInconelWeldingSuperalloyQuenching (fluorescence)AlloyGas tungsten arc weldingHardening (computing)Filler (materials)Intergranular corrosionPrecipitation hardeningTungstenComposite materialArc welding

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of filler alloy composition on post-weld heat treatment (PWHT) cracking in Inconel (trade name of the Special Metals group of companies) 738LC (IN-738LC) superalloy was investigated. Five filler alloys (IN-625, IN-718, FM-92, C-263 and Rene-41), containing varying concentrations of Al and Ti, were used to gas tungsten arc (GTA) weld IN-738LC superalloy specimens which were given two different preweld heat treatments. Additionally, autogenous (without filler) welds were also made on the same two preweld heat treated materials. The preweld heat treatments consisted of the standard industrial solution heat treatment (SHT) at 1120°C for 2 h in vacuum followed by argon quenching and a new heat treatment (UMT), developed by the authors to improve the heat affected zone (HAZ) cracking resistance of IN-738LC. The latter heat treatment comprised of solution treatment at 1120°C for 2 h followed by aging at 1025°C for 16 h and then water quenching. The welded specimens were given a PWHT consisting of solution treatment at 1120°C for 2 h in vacuum followed by argon quenching and subsequent aging at 845°C for 24 h in vacuum. Intergranular cracking was observed in all the PWHT welds, regardless of the filler alloy; however, autogenous welds suffered the highest amount of cracking, and cracking susceptibility of the filler welds reduced with a decrease in concentration of the main hardening elements, Al and Ti, in the fillers. While cracks were observed only in the HAZ of the as welded samples, almost all the PWHT samples were found to have cracks in the fusion zone (FZ) and in the base metal (BM), in addition to those present in the HAZ. The severity of cracking in the SHT preweld heat treated material was, however, consistently higher than that observed in the UMT preweld treated material, in both autogenous and filler welds. The microstructure of FZ of the welds made with various filler alloys consisted of a unimodal distribution of small spheroidal γ‘ particles of 0˙10–0˙15 μm, while a bimodal distribution of γ‘ precipitates, consisting of large cuboidal particles of about 0˙5–0˙6 μm and fine spheroidal γ‘ particles of ∼0˙1 μm, was observed in FZ of the autogenous welds. Results of the microstructural analysis and crack measurements were correlated with the chemical composition and the precipitation kinetics of γ‘ in the filler alloys. It was observed that PWHT cracking in GTA welds of IN-738LC was reduced to a significant extent by using age hardenable fillers with (Al+Ti) concentration less than that in the BM. The PWHT cracking resistance of IN-738LC was further improved by the use of these fillers in conjunction with the UMT preweld heat treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.491

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it