MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073448949 · doi:10.1190/1.2399275

Technological development and applications of nonseismic methods for hydrocarbon exploration in China

2006· article· en· W2073448949 on OpenAlexaff
Xi-Shuang Wang, Yi Weiqi, Baihong Wen, Hui Yang, Xiaofan Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Leading Edge · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSeismology and Earthquake Studies
Canadian institutionsPetro-Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaHydrocarbon explorationHydrocarbonPetroleum engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringGeologyChemistryGeographyArchaeologyPaleontologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spurred by advances in instrumentation and acquisition technologies, including processing and interpretation software of geophysical data over the past decade, CNPC and PetroChina have developed integrated geophysical exploration technologies for five different applications: rugged terrain and complicated subsurface structures, deeply buried paleotopographic hill structures, volcanic rocks, direct hydrocarbon detection at shallow-to-medium depths, and reservoir characterization and fluid monitoring. These will be discussed in more detail later in conjunction with six case studies, listed below, that demonstrate their application. The numbers correspond to the geographic locations indicated by the same number in Figure 1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.794
Threshold uncertainty score0.134

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Leading EdgeSame topicSeismology and Earthquake StudiesFrench-language works237,207