MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2073476553 · doi:10.1139/p02-023

Topology of QCD vacuum and color confinement

2002· article· en· W2073476553 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
H. C. Chandola, H. C. Pandey, Hemwati Nandan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsQuantum chromodynamicsFlux tubeGauge theoryColor confinementString (physics)Symmetry (geometry)Gauge symmetryQCD vacuumTopology (electrical circuits)Quantum electrodynamicsMathematical physicsMagnetic fluxMagnetic fieldQuantum mechanicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using the magnetic symmetry structure of non-Abelian gauge theories of the Yang–Mills type, the mathematical foundation of dual chromodynamics in fiber-bundle form is discussed. The dual gauge potential in its restricted form is constructed in terms of magnetic vectors on global sections, which has been shown to lead the dual dynamics between topological charges and color isocharges. Constructing the Lagrangian for such dual theory, the dynamical breaking of magnetic symmetry by an effective potential is shown to push the QCD vacuum in a confining phase. The dynamical structure of the theory is investigated by deriving the field equations associated with the confining phase. The associated flux-tube structure responsible for the confinement is analyzed by computing the asymptotic string solutions of the field equations under cylindrical symmetry. Using the confining part of the dual restricted Lagrangian, the finite string energy per unit length is calculated and its implications on color confinement are discussed. PACS Nos.: 11.38Aw, 14.80Hv, 11.30Jw

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physics→Same topicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics→French-language works237,207→