MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Modelling of Electroelastic Behaviour of Embedded Piezoelectric Actuators in Smart Structures: 2D and 3D Effects

2012· article· en· W2073486560 on OpenAlexaff
Bin Zhao, Xiaodong Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced materials research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAeroelasticity and Vibration Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActuatorPiezoelectricityMaterials scienceFinite element methodStress (linguistics)Structural engineeringShear (geology)Smart materialAcousticsMechanical engineeringComposite materialEngineeringPhysicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A two-dimensional electroelastic model of embedded piezoelectric actuators was proposed to study the coupled electromechanical behaviour of a thin piezoceramic actuator embedded in an elastic host structure under applied stresses. Interfacial normal and shear stresses for both plane stress and plane strain deformations were calculated to evaluate the actuation effects transferred from the actuator to the host structure. Three dimensional analyses were also conducted using the finite element method to validate the present model by comparing the two results for specific examples. It was observed that the current model provided reasonable prediction of the load transfer by the actuator.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score0.508

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced materials researchSame topicAeroelasticity and Vibration ControlFrench-language works237,207