MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073505474 · doi:10.1109/cloud.2014.73

D-Mash: A Framework for Privacy-Preserving Data-as-a-Service Mashups

2014· article· en· W2073505474 on OpenAlexafffund
Mahtab Arafati, Gaby G. Dagher, Benjamin C. M. Fung, Patrick C. K. Hung

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityOntario Tech UniversityConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMashupScalabilityComputer scienceCloud computingService providerInformation privacyWeb serviceWorld Wide WebService (business)Computer securityDatabaseWeb 2.0Business

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data-as-a-Service (DaaS) mashup enables data providers to dynamically integrate their data on demand depending on consumers' requests. Utilizing DaaS mashup, however, involves some challenges. Mashing up data from multiple sources to answer a consumer's request might reveal sensitive information and thereby compromise the privacy of individuals. Moreover, data integration of arbitrary DaaS providers might not always be sufficient to answer incoming requests. In this paper, we provide a cloud-based framework for privacy-preserving DaaS mashup that enables secure collaboration between DaaS providers for the purpose of generating an anonymous dataset to support data mining. Experiments on real-life data demonstrate that our DaaS mashup framework is scalable and can efficiently and effectively satisfy the data privacy and data mining requirements specified by the DaaS providers and the data consumers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.119
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science
Consensus categoriesOpen science
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.442
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.119
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.1620.373
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataFrench-language works237,207