Enhanced affect/cognition-related brain responses during visceral placebo analgesia in irritable bowel syndrome patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Placebo analgesia is a psychosocial context effect that is rarely studied in visceral pain. Patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) exhibit visceral hyperalgesia and heightened affective/cognitive brain region activation during visceral stimuli. Psychological factors alter the pain and brain activation pattern, and these changes are more pronounced in IBS patients. Expectation constitutes the major neuropsychological mechanism in the placebo effect. This study confirmed the heightened affective/cognitive brain responses in IBS patients during visceral placebo analgesia using a placebo model with expectation, which was enhanced by suggestion and conditioning. Seventeen IBS patients and 17 age-/sex-matched controls were enrolled. Psychophysical inventories (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS], visual analogue scale, and short-form McGill questionnaire) were completed. Brain activity during placebo intervention and anticipation was assessed in response to rectal distension using 3T-functional magnetic resonance imaging. Suggestion-/conditioning-enhanced placebo was used to convince controls/patients of the efficacy of a newly developed intravenous drug (saline, in actuality) for the relief of rectal distension-induced visceral pain. A comparable visceral placebo analgesia was observed in IBS patients and control subjects. IBS patients demonstrated a higher HADS-anxiety score, which was predictive of a weak placebo effect. Suggestion-/conditioning-enhanced placebo evoked more activity in affective/cognitive brain regions (insula, midcingulate cortex, and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex [VLPFC]) in IBS patients than in healthy controls. VLPFC was also more active during anticipation in IBS patients. In conclusion, IBS patients and control subjects achieved comparable placebo analgesia during experimentally induced rectal pain. The visceral placebo analgesia produced heightened activity in affective/cognitive brain regions in IBS patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".